Protecting Teachers’ Time (From the General Secretary)
Assessing student achievement and reporting that progress to parents is a big part of teachers’ lives today. That’s why, in the last round of collective agreements, ETFO worked hard to increase professional activity days for teachers. These days are meant to give you time to complete report cards. This year, the province has finally seen fit to eliminate one of the three report cards elementary teachers were expected to prepare every year. The first report card will be replaced by a progress report. We welcome this development. It is one teacher federations had been advocating for some time.
As seems always to be the case, however, every step forward can be accompanied by unnecessary difficulties. The report card changes are no exception. To be useful to teachers, the two professional activity days for completing report cards should be scheduled two or three weeks before the report cards are due. If they are provided sooner, teachers will not have completed their assessments. Some boards have scheduled the days on the basis of student transportation issues, not teacher requirements. This is not appropriate.
In yet other instances, boards have decided that the fall progress report will be followed by teacher-parent interviews. We take no exception to that plan as long as it is the boards’ professional activity days that are used and not the PA days provided in teacher collective agreements. Parents who want to know how their child is doing in school understand that talking to the teacher is the best strategy. They know that teachers regularly conduct their own classroom-based assessment of students. Teachers record the results and use them to help their students’ progress.
Despite the clear superiority of teacher classroom assessment, our schools are inundated by externally mandated assessments such as EQAO testing, the Developmental Reading Assessment (DRA), etc. These tests are not of teachers’ devising, but are mandated by the school board and/or the Ministry of Education. They are administered to serve the needs of the board and the education system, not those of teachers and students. They are part of the testing frenzy currently enveloping our elementary schools.
Because it is boards or the ministry that decide these tests are needed, the administrative work that accompanies them – such as inputting test data – is work that properly belongs to boards or the ministry. It is not work that teachers should be expected to do. If boards expect teachers to input this testing data, they should, at a minimum, provide the release time to do it. They must not expect teachers to do this administrative work as a routine part of their duties.
Elementary teachers are professionals who are themselves best placed to determine how they should use their time. Their collective agreements work to protect and enhance their professional responsibilities. Teachers’ time should not be inappropriately infringed upon to serve the need of boards and the education system to conduct ever increasing numbers of tests.